"Better yet, what about the Crusades?"
Haven't been around for the discussion about the crusades being easily shown to have been a defensive response to Islamic imperialism which within 100 years of the death of Muhammad had taken most of Europe up to and including Spain and part of France as well as Northern Africa?
At some point a stand absolutely had to be taken.
I firmly disagree with anyone who suggests that adherence to a religion founded by a known pedophile, slave owner, rapists, and murderer is not to blame for any part of the actions of Islamic terrorists. In fact the idea is absurd.
McCarthyism and the civil war are terrible analogies and are completely incompatible with the issue.
Your personal anecdotal experiences are just that and are also meaningless to the issue.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion, I just believe it to be based on an unrealistic, and somewhat uninformed worldview. It might make for a nice politically correct statement but simply isn't supported by centuries of evidence.





Bookmarks